Linguists have had a field day with Donald Trump. His speeches are geared for a fourth-grade reading level, with very few four-syllable words. He doesn’t use any complex sentence structures. His vocabulary is notoriously poor and centers around a few repetitive words such as "tremendous" and "problem." Most insidious of all, he ends his rambling nonsense with words such as "problem," "liars," and "losers"--which is what most of his viewers eventually take away from his speeches. I never thought I’d see a presidential candidate make Dubya look like an eloquent orator, but here we are.
Read MoreWhat Does It Mean When We Label Women & Artists as 'Quirky'?
What does quirky mean, really? Who gets this label, and why? And what are the real consequences?
Read MoreInterview With Meg Ross, Founder Of The Nooky Box
We’re basically saying, as a company, we’re recognizing that everybody’s having sex, it’s always been happening. We think that everyone should continue to do it and talk about it in a really healthy way so that you can enjoy it more, not feel ashamed, not feel embarrassed, and really just enjoy yourself. That’s our philosophy.
Read MoreStop Telling Me To Smile: 2 Rad Parsons Students Photograph Sad Gurlz as A Reponse
BY TABITHA SHIFLETT
If you’re a woman, then you’ve probably experienced the whole You Should Smile More charade. We’ve heard it all before – those gross, sexist comments ranging from, “Life isn’t that bad, honey!” to the plea, “Smile!
Usually, a man, grinning ear-to-ear like a Cheshire cat, is behind this annoying string of cliché phrases just waiting for us to have an epiphany – thanks to his underhanded compliment – and smile like we’re told.
Fed up and completely unamused with what society has dubbed as “resting bitch face,” Parsons photography students Sam Lichtenstein and Jess Williams took matters into their own hands.
The cheeky photo collaboration, “SAD GURLZ,” is a collation of portraits of bold, badass women redefining what it means to have a poker face – or just a face that walks down the street, minding its own business. Radiating rebellion, the images project power and major self-respect.
Both Lichtenstein and Williams spoke with an air of certainty and seriousness.
“We tell our models to look as bored, unamused, and annoyed as possible,” says Lichtenstein. “Which is contrary to how women are normally portrayed in photos....Women are always being told to smile, whether it’s in a photo or when they are just walking down the street, so we want to push that idea aside.”
To become a SG, models must apply via an online form with a theme and color backdrop in mind. Each model is accompanied by a short narrative further explaining the meaning of their photo.
Model Ana, who posed with a handful of Wendy’s French fries, writes "I'm a SAD GURL because eating healthy is the new black. Personally, I'd pick chicken nuggets over an apple any day.”
The photoshoot is a two-step process – once the accepted candidates are photographed against the background of their choice, a compilation of items that correlate with the theme are also shot. The two photos are then displayed side-by-side on the SG website, Instagram account, and Facebook page.
“It’s hard being a woman and even more so for those in the LGBT community,” says Williams. “We want SAD GURLZ to be an outlet for all women to speak out without actually having to say anything.”
The project began in February as an online photo album. But once word got out, the dynamic duo found their inbox overflowing with inquiries. They participated in Parsons' PHOTOFEAST, a bi-annual pin-up exhibit open to New York photography students. That was in April.
“We’re in contact with an all-female gallery in Tempe, Arizona and there’s talk of doing a collaboration and having our very first SG gallery show,” says Williams. “There’s also a magazine based in Spain and Belgium that plans on featuring us and our work.”
And, as if that wasn’t exciting enough, the two say they’re in the process of publishing a 75-page book that features the models they’ve photographed thus far.
“It feels so good to have our work recognized by the people around us,” says Williams. “But, it’s exhilarating to find that our work is being acknowledged by others across the country and the world.”
Fans can currently pre-order the book on the SG website.
Tabitha Shiflett is a graduate of the Dub (The University of North Carolina Wilmington, UNCW). She's written for Her Campus, Seahawk Chic, CBSLocal and Elite Daily. She is currently enrolled in the Creative Publishing and Critical Journalism MA program at The New School in New York City.
How My 85-Year-Old Mom Rebooted Her Modeling Career
BY ANNA MURRAY
“Does your mother have an agent?” the creative director asked.
Eileen Ford died two years ago. “Um. Not at the moment.”
“What about travel to Paris? Is she up for it?”
I was waiting in line for chopped salads. Ninety seconds prior, I saw the overseas number and answered my cell phone. Now I was talking to a woman from my past about pitching my mother and me in a global ad campaign.
A photo essay I wrote for Vox was going viral. It was about my mom, Patsy Shally, a former world-famous fashion model.
From 1948 through 1960, my mother was the apex of commercial beauty – young, thin and exquisite. Discovered at 13, she was a top model for Eileen Ford, on the cover of practically everything. She went for screen tests with Rock Hudson and one-on-one interviews with legendary Hollywood producer Melvyn Leroy.
Mom and I recreated her most famous Vogue, Glamour, and McCall’s covers. The piece I wrote was about beauty and aging.
A particular series of photographs was drawing the most attention: our twist on my mother’s 1956 Irving Penn Vogue cover.
“The elderly shouldn’t be invisible,” Mom said. “We matter.”
It was clear from our photo shoot Mom, at 85, still “had it.”
The project hit home. We were picked up in the Daily Mail and ran in their network worldwide. We were being tweeted by Racked, by Newsweek and by the producer of Rizzoli and Isles.
People were contacting me from all nooks and crannies of my life, including Sam, a long-past acquaintance, and the current creative director for an international ad agency. She said our story resonated. The brand was thrilled. We could be big.
“I think she can probably travel,” I answered. Mom has her frail moments. But we were talking Paris.
“I’ll need whatever additional photos you have. Also traffic and social shares.”
Over the last few weeks, Mom and I had received hundreds of comments from people who said our project touched them.
Here’s what I found most surprising:
· People called us “fearless.”
· People said they cried.
· Men said the essay touched them.
· Someone suggested my mother might be the next Mrs. Donald Trump.
Mom and I had joined a great zeitgeist-y army of age-barrier-busting beauty warriors. There was Elon Musk’s mother, 68, now elbowing out Botox blondes for ad campaigns. And Vogue putting a 100-year-old on its cover for their 100th anniversary.
“It's important that all women and consumers are featured on the runway and in advertorials. Women of all ages wear clothes- why should they be left out?” said fashion designer Carrie Hammer, famous for her recent fall 2015 show called, “Role Models Not Runway Models.”
“Your recreations of your mother’s covers are a powerful message of love, courage and understanding,” said Nyna Giles, author of the upcoming book The Bridesmaid’s Daughter.
Giles was one of the most amazing out-of-the-woodwork surfacers. Her mother, Carolyn Scott, modeled with mine. Giles book recounts her mother’s career, including Barbizon roomie Grace Kelly. It will be published by St. Martin’s Press next year.
It’s important, Giles said, even at this late date, to give our mothers their names back. “They were the first super models. Today they would have been household names. But back then, only the photographers were credited.”
A modeling job in 2016 would be quite a capper to Mom’s career. What a terrific irony: My mom, who defined the mainstream ideal of youth and beauty, was challenging that very ideal in her 9th decade.
The next few weeks were ferociously busy. Sam’s team prepared the pitch and she contacted me daily for additional information—copies of comments, web stats, requests for more photographs. Dad, 88, got their passports renewed.
Mom was calm. She knew the gig, literally, despite the 56-year gap between this and her last job. She only asked, “Did they say how many days would we be working?” There would, after all, be shopping to do.
Then, a week ago, Sam said the brand in question was favoring an alternate concept her agency had pitched.
I was disappointed. Mom shrugged: That’s life in super model fast lane. Sam salved the blow by saying I would be shocked and “so proud” once I knew who actually got the job. “You won’t believe who you were up against and almost made it!”
Who could it be? I conducting a quick survey of Mom’s and my new fans—asking them to guess who won out over us.
“Lord, I hope it’s not Kim Kardashian and Caitlyn Jenner!” Howled one. That might rattle even professional Mom’s sang froid.
Here are the guesses. The leading candidates for Mom’s and my nemeses:
· Gwyneth Paltrow & Blythe Danner
· Goldie Hawn and Kate Hudson
· Isabella Rossellini and Elettra Rossellini Wiedemann
· Ellen & Betty DeGeneres
· Madonna & Lourdes Leon
· Jerry Hall & Georgia May Jagger
· Iman & Lexi Bowie
· Jada Pinkett Smith and Willow Smith
· Twiggy and Carly Lawson
· Zoe Kravitz and Lisa Bonet
· Anderson Cooper and Gloria Vanderbilt
I’m keeping watch on Ad Age to see if someone gets it right.
In the meantime, we are receiving other interesting nibbles. And Mom could really use an agent.
Anna Murray is CEO of emedia, llc., a technology consulting company, and a writer. Her essays have appeared in Vox, The Daily Mail, Soundings Review, Piker Press, Adanna, and The Guardian Witness. Her recently completed new novel is represented by David Black Agency. It features a once-famous model and her look-alike daughter. Her non-fiction title, The Complete Software Project Manager, was published in January 2016 by John Wiley & Sons. One reviewer commented, “This is a technical book that reads like a novel.”
Anagnorisis: Rebirth in Recognizing Your Truth
My arms yearned for these strangers, these men and women who walked in the shadows of their minds, feeling alone, feeling as though they did not share a thread with any part of society.
BY S.K. CLARKE
I am a firm believer that humankind requires food, water, shelter, and intimacy. After our stomachs are full and our bodies are kept warm, we desire the ability to be seen by another human being, to be heard and understood.
The pivotal moments in my life have centered on someone acknowledging my self, the oft-guarded soul that is tucked away from casual observers. Often the other’s ability to see me results in an enlightenment; a move from shaded reality to exposed self-truth. It is important to note that this truth is not always beautiful. We may not always be ready to accept the knowledge when it is thrust upon us by the seeing few, but it is honest and bears the weight of import, all the same.
Aristotle called this moment of self-reveal or recognition, anagnorisis. Often in Greek tragedies, the protagonist is in the dark about some aspect of their being. InOedipus Rex, Oedipus was ignorant to his truth: he had killed his biological father, married his biological mother, and gave her children.
In the case of Oedipus, his understanding of self, both what he stood for and who he was in society, came with the reveal of his paternity. But what’s interesting to note, is that the audience was fully aware of who Oedipus was long before the big reveal. The Greek people were a learned audience who had seen these stories play out several times before. The Oedipal legend was old and the men who had gathered to see the play performed would have known the ending before the characters on stage would live it. The reason they went was in order to see which playwright wrote the best version; which Oedipus would spark something new within the audience.
In this I find a unique formof anagnorisis that can only be found in art: a recognition of ourselves within the creative minds of the artist.
This movement of self-knowing from the external to the internal can often be found in the paintings, the music, the poems and stories that traverse time and space to enter our psyche through the crackle of a record player or the luminescence of a Kindle screen. Lyrics and verses and compositions and brushstrokes that navigate time, space, and language to knock at the cement fortresses within our souls and say, “Hey, I know you. You are not alone.”
For me, there has been a therapy in the words of Neil Young, Billy Joel, Damien Rice, and Ray LaMontagne. Their lyrics call to me, assuring me that someone somewhere has been a miner for a heart of gold and they, too, see me in all of my vulnerability, in the darkest places where my self lies hidden from the daily world. Their careful placing of syllables and emotions finally, exuberantly, pitifully give voice to all that I’ve been wanting to say, whether I knew it before or not.
I’ve found it in the carefully constructed words of authors Sherwood Anderson, Edgar Lee Masters, and Colum McCann, the dark despair of poetess Christina Rossetti, the inspirational instruction of Brené Brown. Within the isolated activity of reading, within their solitude of writing, I found a piece of myself. A communication between myself and an unknowable stranger who, reaching across distance, reaching beyond death, declares that they see me as I am and have shared in what I have felt.
As an educator, theatre artist, and writer, I often strive for this feeling of communion with my students, aiming for them to experience the power to be known. I hope that in the pages of dramatic literature, my students and actors can say, “In this, I see me.” I hope that they can find the human in all and through that magic of recognition, they will see themselves in Stella, Ophelia, and Everyman. And, perhaps, that Stella, Ophelia, and Everyman will cause them to see humanity within themselves.
Through this seeing, this knowing, a beauteous progress is made. Stagnation is held at bay and something entirely cosmic enters into our lives, whether we expected it or not.
As an instructor, I often do not anticipate this progress to be made in my own life. I have read Hamlet no less than thirty times. For me, the recognition has already been made and now I get to enjoy those steps in my students.
However, when I began directing a play this past semester, I was shocked to find that art still had more to show me.
The play centered on the cycle of abuse within relationships, both romantic and familial. A young wife is beaten within an inch of her life and through a series of increasingly absurd circumstances, is all but forgotten by the end of the play. Both she and the brain damage she possesses are erased from the family’s consciousness. The end of the play leaves the audience with the impression that the mental and physical abuse done to her is doomed to be repeated because it has never been fully addressed.
The artist in me latched on to the uncomfortability of this, the unfinished, unpolished ending that would remind us all that abuse knows no happy conclusion. I wanted the audience to feel embarrassed and uneasy, hoping that through some self-reflection they would see abusive behaviors in their own lives and after much thought, seek to eradicate them.
The future mother in me, however, felt that I personally needed to create a positive change in the community. I needed those who I worked in and around to know that this did not have to be the answer: that cycles can end and progress can be made to heal, to repair.
Encouraged by projects such as Humans of New York and PostSecret, the drama club and I worked together to place boxes throughout the college campus, asking for students, faculty, and staff to submit their “secrets,” their moments of abuse, harassment, or discrimination in hopes that, through the sharing, they would gain back a voice they did not feel they had.
Over the course of three weeks, we received over 150 responses. A few of the posts were drawings of a penis ranging in anatomical accuracy, but the majority of the submissions were heart-wrenching confessions of disease, abuse, insecurity, and desire.
“I feel like I have no true useful purpose and no true direction,” one submission said.
One confessed: “I forgot my little sister’s birthday.”
“I suffer from claustrophobia because my father used to lay on top of me,” exposed another.
Many revealed a long-harbored affection toward their best friends while others admitted to instances of infidelity. A large majority dealt with mental illness and some confessed the wish to end their own lives. One revealed that they were HIV-positive.
My arms yearned for these strangers, these men and women who walked in the shadows of their minds, feeling alone, feeling as though they did not share a thread with any part of society. Perhaps feeling that no one could empathize. No one could understand.
But I am writing this today to tell you I do understand. I do see you. I get it.
As I paged through secret after secret, I felt an unexpected click of recognition, a cracking of my defenses, a revealing of my truth. Many of the secrets dealt with rape. Many of those same confessions were also partnered with the statement that they had not told anybody, some for many years. Some had not mentioned their abuse until they had put it down on the slip of paper I now held in my hand.
I did not submit a secret to the project, but if I did it would read: I was raped and for three-and-a-half years I believed that it had been my fault.
I was staying at a friend’s family home in Italy. My friends and their family were all tucked away in their beds. I was downstairs being raped.
The guy was placed in my path deliberately. He was supposed to be a good flirt. A morale booster. He was not supposed to sit on my chest and force himself in my mouth. He was supposed to hear me when I said no. He was supposed to stop. He was not supposed to tell me that I deserved it, that I had led him on, that I had to finish what I had started.
I was not supposed to believe him.
But I did.
For years I believed that it had not been rape. It should have been more violent. I should have had scars. If it had been rape, I would have fought harder. The only rape that counted was the violent kind, not the kind that left me asking him quietly to stop, lest I wake anyone.
And so, I remained silent. I did not speak up about what had happened, did not utter the “R” word. I did not tell my friend who had slept upstairs. She had seen me flirt with him earlier in the night and I assumed she would think I was a tease. I didn’t tell my grandmother, though I called her the minute I got back to my apartment. I wanted her to hear my voice. I wanted her to fix what had broken inside of me. She had sounded tired when she had asked me if something was wrong and I chose not to burden her. She was going through chemo after all, and I felt that I was just another whore. I did not tell my mother who holds the key to most of my secrets. I was her good girl, not a sexual being who would be found in those types of situations. In my journals, I remained dumb. In therapy, I skirted the issue.
But as I sat there, holding the secrets of strangers in my hands, I felt the crack of anagnorisis, an understanding of my truth, of what I am and what I stand for.
“I see you,” I said to the anonymous submissions. “And you see me. You never deserved this. You are not wrong. You are not dirty. You are a victim.”
I am not talking about rape culture in America, extremely prevalent though it is. I’m not going to talk about how politics and the media make it difficult for victims to come forward, as was the case in Oklahoma and Brigham Young University. I won’t mention how rape is normalized in television shows such as Game of Thrones or how the porn industry seems to capitalize on male sexual aggression against often unwilling women. Nor will I mention that out of every 100 rapes, only two rapists will go to jail.
This is about finding those men and women who are afraid to view themselves as victims, those who feel alone in their stories of abuse or harassment. You may never hold 150 secrets in your hand, but you now hold mine. What I ask is that you see that unlike the me of three years ago, I now know that I never deserved what was done to me. I also never deserved to hold it within me in silence. I’ve acknowledged that no matter what I was wearing, no matter how I had been conducting myself prior to the incident, I had not given consent. I did not say yes and something that was precious within me was taken and tarnished. I was raped.
You, too, do not need to hold yourself in the shadows.
Whether you suffer from debilitating depression, whether you have experienced rape, sexual harassment, physical or mental abuse, or dependency of any kind, you are not alone. Your secret does not make you any less deserving of love, nor does voicing it admit any weakness. Through using your voice, by putting the words on paper, or sharing your story, you can begin the healing process.
The Aristotlean definition of anagnorisis is often associated with tragedies: King Lear realizes that Cordelia’s love is the truest only after she has died, Nora’s desire for self-knowledge causes her to abandon her husband and children, Bruce Willis discovers he’s dead in The Sixth Sense.
I would like to argue that there can also be a rebirth in the recognition, a happy ending. Only through the dead of winter can we prepare for the blossoming of spring. Only from the gravel can we build a foundation. Only from the ashes can the phoenix be born again. And only through recognizing your truth can we grow, learn, and heal as a whole.
S.K. Clarke is a writer, adjunct professor, and theatre director in Pennsylvania. She has earned her MA in Text and Performance from London’s Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts and her BFA in Acting at Philadelphia’s University of the Arts. Clarke is a writer of poetry, plays, and short stories focusing on the disintegration of small-town America, social and political injustices of minorities, coming-of-age and end-of-life narratives, and stories featuring complicated and strong female characters. She is currently writing her first novel which, she hopes, will touch on all of the aforementioned topics.
Instead of Buying Another Cocktail, Shoot VIDA 10 Bucks...TODAY
BY LISA MARIE BASILE
Or just shoot them 10 bucks and get another cocktail.
Luna readers, today is the last day of VIDA's campaign. They're raised $10,000 so far – which will go toward their count, events, fellowships, and publications.
As editor of Luna Luna Magazine, and as a writer / editor for national and indie magazines, I - like many of you - got my start in literary magazines. I won't sugar-coat it: there are a lot of smarmy, egotistical white male dudebros at the top who want to keep brands old and dusty and free from new voices. We need to fight that power. I am glad VIDA was around to pave the way.
In many journals, especially top tier ones, women - women of color, especially - are published at a frighteningly lower rate. I wish I could say "times are changing" with absolute certainty, but we've got a way to go. VIDA is absolutely at the forefront of that by creating a necessary dialogue in order to elevate parity in literary art and create spaces for diverse voice. Obviously this needs to be applauded. And like Luna Luna, they're all volunteer. They're not sitting on mounds of money.
I think back to a time when, in college, a classroom professor suggested that the women in the class were writing in a "typically feminine" sort of way. As if colors and sounds were particularly womanly. Maybe they are? But the inference was that it was too girly, almost silly, like a young girl scribbling into her diary, unlike the apparently (?) more "real" poetry her male counterparts were writing. It wasn't easy to say that his implications were unfair or pandering or reductionist, or – at worst – sexist.
Those amorphous, slightly off-settling situations happen all the time and need to be defended against. The same is true for racial politics. We should be publishing diverse voices, not squandering opportunity or declining rejections or making it so that women and people of color aren't submitting at all. Nope. Support equality.
Art as a Blend of Many Truths: Why We Shouldn't Question Beyoncé's Narrative
To tell a story (even your own), in a way, is to tell someone else’s–if it were only hers, how could we connect? How could we expect her to own every word? Why must it be debunked or defined at all?
BY LISA MARIE BASILE
Lemonade emerged from darkness at a time of political unrest and volatile racism. For many, I’m sure, it also comes about as a Spring story of rebirth and the divine self; Lemonade’s grief is collective and personal–the story she weaves is everyone’s story, an eternal hurt, the story of mothers who broke at the hands of men, the story of a girl who was too naive, the story of women who take back their agency.
Everyone keeps worrying about the truth; what’s the truth? Is the artist being cheated on? Did she forgive him? Why is he seen, on camera, stroking her ankles, kissing her face? What if it’s about her own mother? What if this is a machine? What if the artist is exploiting rumors about her marriage–and feeding the beast that way? What if the beast isn’t her own?
The fact is that the artist doesn’t always need to have experienced everything first-hand. Certainly, Beyoncé is building a world, one that is universally understood enough to be appreciated: the grief of lost love, the grief of being lied-to, the relentless anger, the baptismal, personal resurrection, the lover's possible forgiveness, the healing power of culture.
One of the ways she builds this world is by featuring the words of poet Warsan Shire. In a New Yorker piece that pre-dated Lemonade by several months, it is clear that even Shire doesn’t claim her work is entirely autobiographical:
“How much of the book is autobiographical is never really made clear, but beside the point. (Though Shire has said, “I either know, or I am every person I have written about, for or as. But I do imagine them in their most intimate settings.”) It’s East African storytelling and coming-of-age memoir fused into one. It’s a first-generation woman always looking backward and forward at the same time, acknowledging that to move through life without being haunted by the past lives of your forebears is impossible.”
This is how art works. As a poet, I play a character and the character plays me–always vacillating between this point in time and that point in time and heart, time owned by me or time owned by someone else, heart owned by me, and heart owned by other. It’s the million ghosts that tell the story, and they’re needed to give it dimension.
We should give artists–and I’m calling Beyoncé an artist, here, and if you don’t like that, bye–the ability to make their art into something alchemical; a little this, a little that. It’s the potion of the collective unconscious, that which is passed down by ancestors, mixed with our consciousness and our memories, our collective experiences of love and sorrow. To tell a story (even your own), in a way, is to tell someone else’s–and if it were only hers, how could we connect? How could we expect her to own every word? Why must it be debunked or defined at all? Why isn't it ok to tell the story of something bigger?
In Lemonade, Beyoncé handles the past–through her grandmother’s voice, Shire’s voice, the history of race in America, the way love has treated her–the present, and the future: a future of hope, a heaven that is a “love without betrayal,” the dissolution of racism, the reclaiming of feminine power, nature as a symbol of forward momentum.
I think we are begging for these many voices, these many moving parts she has woven; I am happy it was a collaboration. It gives me hope for art.
And don’t drink the Haterade: “It’s her producers, it’s the songwriters, it’s the people she hired.” When people reduce any artist to this, they’re reducing art, which I suspect is antithetical to their whole point. Being an artist takes knowing how to harness the power of many, it takes knowing how to build a vision, and it takes knowing how to embody that world. Nothing can be done alone.
The time you spend questioning her writing credits, her veracity, her money – is time you could be devoting to the very moving art created by Beyoncé and her team – poets and directors and the powerful Black women she features. It says something, and if you give it the space, I’m sure it will talk to you.
Lisa Marie Basile is a NYC-based poet, editor, and writer. She’s the founding editor-in-chief of Luna Luna Magazine, and her work has appeared in The Establishment, Bustle, Hello Giggles, The Gloss, xoJane, Good Housekeeping, Redbook, and The Huffington Post, among other sites. She is the author of Apocryphal (Noctuary Press, Uni of Buffalo) and a few chapbooks. Her work as a poet and editor have been featured in Amy Poehler’s Smart Girls, The New York Daily News, Best American Poetry, and The Rumpus, and PANK, among others. She currently works for Hearst Digital Media, where she edits for The Mix, their contributor network. Follow her on Twitter@lisamariebasile.
The Death of the Female Friendship
BY ALAINA LEARY
This piece is part of the Relationship Issue. Read more here.
It’s happening again. That’s what I remember thinking as I sat across from my best friend on her Queen-sized bed and listened to her describe her ex. I was starting to have feelings for my closest female friend.
This was a pattern I knew well, and I’d been holding my breath that it wouldn’t happen again. I was incapable of having a best friend. I fell in love with all of them. I loved every moment that came before—long nights, sitting up in the dark, telling our shittiest life stories back and forth without judgment; laughing at the same inside jokes over and over again; catching glimpses of one another and understanding what was being felt without a single word.
It was everything that happened afterward that haunted me: the death of the friendship. I just wasn’t meant to have a best friend, I figured.
About a month ago, I read a fantastic personal essay called “I’m Having a Friendship Affair,” in New York Magazine’s The Cut, and I almost had my answer. Almost. Somewhere in the middle of the essay, the writer has an identity crises and wonders, “Am I into women?” and her friend urges her to think about whether she wants to have oral sex with a chick. No, she doesn’t. The writer shakes her head and moves on with her life.
While I appreciated so many of the complexities of female friendship described in that essay, they didn’t quite add up to my lived experience. When I say I’ve fallen in love with my last four best female friends, I mean it. And I hate that I do.
Fast forward to the point where my best friend at the time, Macey, learned about my feelings for her. This was usually the beginning of the end in my vicious friend cycle. If the friend found out, she was usually not into girls, or even just not into me in that way. I’d apologize, so would she, and we’d stay friends—but not quite in the same way. Once I’d bared every vulnerable part of myself to someone and then fallen in love, I couldn’t go back from that. The friendship would remain, but we’d never get back those eye-catching moments in a crowd where we knew one another’s thoughts. I was always guarded.
To my surprise, this best friend liked me back. And suddenly everything I knew had changed.
Before, I’d always been a witty cynic, the kind of person who didn’t quite believe in fate, and definitely did not believe in relationships. I grew up with separated parents, who took their turns raising me (my mom, before she died, and my dad, after) and as a result, had internalized that independent, single-forever mindset.
For the next few years, my best friend and I carved out what it meant to be dating from the ashes of our friendship. I was surprised to find that our best friendship didn’t die. Even under the pressures of dating—sex, romance, coming out, transitioning to college, choosing a career path, jealousy, competition—our friendship was what kept us steady. If anything, our friendship was the priority. Sometimes, I’d be in the middle of fighting with her, stubbornly unwilling to give up my perspective, and then I’d step back. Would I fight with my best friend about this? No. And we’d laugh, and turn on American Horror Story with our roommates and laugh some more.
Being best friends first meant some weird things. It meant we talked about hot guys still, especially if they were actors or fictional characters. We claimed ‘boyfriends’ and we had a few that we shared—our ‘polyamorous’ ones, if you will, that we both would not let go of. It took us a little longer to talk about other hot girls, but we got there, too. We had all the strange, in-depth discussions that friends would have, but we altered them. Who would you date out of all our friends, if I weren’t an option and you had to pick? What if it were just sex, who would you pick then? Our answers varied depending on the day, but we always ended up in a heap and a fit of laughter, out-of-breath.
A few years into our relationship, my first new female best friend entered my life. I knew what was happening as soon as it started. She and I took a day trip to visit a nearby college and we talked the entire ride. We couldn’t shut up. I stayed over her house that night, in her old bunk bed from childhood, and we passed stories back and forth, her on the bottom bunk, me on the top. I didn’t doze off until past four in the morning.
The next morning, the fear was prominent: would I fall in love with my new best friend? Was this inevitable? Would I slowly fall out of love with my girlfriend, all the while falling for my very straight, very unavailable new closest friend?
Six months passed, and then a year. My best friend was beautiful: she had thick, blonde hair and big brown eyes. She was stubborn, but knew how to speak her mind. She was a feminist with a stark point of view. She was argumentative and funny, with a silly streak that emerged at the most random of times. One night, we spend hours looking up videos of spiders and purposefully trying to freak ourselves out, and then hiding under the covers. I was so certain it would happen again, just like it always did, as I slowly stripped away the layers of my soul to her.
When it didn’t happen, I was both relieved and confused. This was how it felt, I suddenly knew, to have a best friend without the romantic feelings lingering in the background, calling for the death of my female friendship. I didn’t dig a grave for this one. As time wore on, naturally, my best friend and my girlfriend also became close. Since my girlfriend was also my best friend, we lacked the normal third-wheel awkwardness when we spent time with others. It seemed more like a group of best girl friends than one single woman and a couple.
I still consider myself cursed to fall for my friends, but maybe the falling isn’t always a trap. It isn’t always a death sentence. In fact, it started to happen with a best friend while I was in college. And I was already in love with my girlfriend, so my immediate response was, “Is this emotional cheating? Is our relationship over?”
Friendship and love are complicated. How do we define them? If I love someone and I want to protect them with my whole heart, and I also find them aesthetically pleasing, is that romantic love? Or is it only love if I want to have sex with them? Or if I want to marry them? Is it only love if I would actually break up with my girlfriend—with my best friend, my soul mate—to be with them?
I loved my girlfriend, and I loved my best friend. But how could I know if I was in love with her? In the most basic sense of the word, I was. I wanted to spend the rest of my life with her. But I didn’t imagine the things you’re supposed to imagine, the signs that tell you, “This is definitely romantic love.” I didn’t imagine owning a house together or having a child. I just knew that I always wanted her to be in my life. She mattered.
Did I have to give up my friendship? Was it wrong to want more than just one person in my life forever? Did this make me a cheater, or polyamorous? We’re not taught, especially as women, that we’re allowed to prioritize more than one person in our lives. For the most part, after we settle into committed relationships and get married, we make decisions with our romantic partners. How to live, where to work, what car to buy, how many cats to have—those are all questions we examine with our spouses. But why do we limit our lives in this way? Why couldn’t I factor my best friend in, or any of my friends in? Why couldn’t I want to spend the rest of my life with someone, but not want to sleep with them or to open a mutual IRA?
According to society’s rules, I was either in love with my best friend or not. I was either in love with my girlfriend or not. But the truth is that it’s more complicated than that. The lines between friendship and romantic love are thinner than I imagined they could be, because so many of my close friends are beautiful. And I love them. And I want to factor them in, and make decisions in consideration of them, even though all the usual rules don’t apply.
Did I end up having to choose between a friend and my girlfriend? No. I chose myself. I chose to live my life in a way that doesn’t have a pre-existing formula. My girlfriend and I make major decisions together, but I factor my friends in, or at least the ones who matter. I factor her family and my family in. And our relationship is never just the two of us. It’s the two of us, plus our two adopted cats, plus our hamster, plus our friends and families, plus our celebrity and fictional crushes. It’s the two of us, plus everyone else who matters.
If I fall in love with my female best friends now—and I do, often, usually in the smallest moments, like when I catch them crying or I see them defending someone else—there is no mourning period. It doesn’t feel like I’m standing on a cliff; it feels like I’m jumping into darkness and then landing, and then jumping again, and the cycle repeats.
My girlfriend and I entered a weird new dimension when we started dating. We broke all the rules. We made up our own rules, about how we love each other, how we love other people, how we love the world. Sometimes, we even laugh at other couples—not because we think they’re doing a single thing wrong, but because we have no idea what we’re doing. There’s no script for how to love someone with your whole soul as a best friend, and then slowly introduce physical romance, sex, long-term commitment, sharing finances, living together, making joint decisions, adopting cats, and eventually, raising kids, into that relationship. We redefined what it means to be in love with each other, and in doing so, I broke the curse.
Alaina Leary is a native Bostonian currently completing her MA in Publishing and Writing at Emerson College. She's also working as an editor and social media designer for several brands and publications. Her work has been published in Cosmopolitan, Seventeen, Marie Claire, BUST Magazine, Good Housekeeping, AfterEllen, Her Campus, Ravishly, The Mighty, and others. When she's not busy playing around with words, she spends her time surrounded by her two cats, Blue and Gansey, and at the beach with her girlfriend. She can often be found re-reading her favorite books, watching Gilmore Girls, and covering everything in glitter. You can find her on Instagram and Twitter @alainaskeys.
Here Are Some Women Directors Whose Beautiful Work Deserves More Love
CURATED BY EMMA EDEN RAMOS
Each Women’s History Month, The Library of Congress, The National Archives and Records Administration, The National Endowment for the Humanities, The National Gallery of Art, The National Park Service, The Smithsonian Institution, and other institutes pay homage to pioneers in The Women’s Movement. As this celebratory month just came to a close, we want to acknowledge a group of female artists who deserve (more) recognition and (more) admiration. So, given that it's Friday today (which means you can Netflix ALL weekend), we are proud to offer you, our lovely readers, a “playlist” of films directed by women. Put these films on your queueor Amazon wish-list. You won’t regret it. Trust us.
Agnès Varda: Cléo from 5 to 7
"I'm too good for men."
Sally Potter: Orlando
Orlando: "If I were a man...I might choose not to risk my life for an uncertain cause. I might think that freedom won by death is not worth having. In fact..."
Agnieszka Holland: Copying Beethoven
"Forgive me. I may be a woman, but I am the best student."
Ava DuVernay: Selma
"Our lives are not fully lived if we're not willing to die for those we love, for what we believe."
Lisa Cholodenko: High Art
"I'm Greta. I live for Lucy... I mean, I live here, with Lucy."
Laurie Collyer: Sherrybaby
"From the ages of 16 to 22, heroin was the love of my life."
Deborah Kampmeier: Hounddog
“If you don’t you keep on singing, keep on feeling the spirit. If your dreams go underground for a while, buried so deep in the earth so they can survive, you just keep feeling the spirit even in the dark.”
Leah Meyerhoff: I Believe in Unicorns
“I have so much to say… but I don’t know where to start. Maybe when I learn how to breath.. I’ll know how to speak."
Emma Eden Ramos is a writer from New York City. Her middle grade novella titled The Realm of the Lost was published in 2012 by MuseItUp Publishing. Her short stories have appeared in Stories for Children Magazine, The Legendary, The Citron Review, BlazeVOX Journal, and other journals. Ramos’ novelette, "Where the Children Play," was included in Resilience: Stories, Poems, Essays, Words for LGBT Teens, edited by Eric Nguyen. Three Women: A Poetic Triptych and Selected Poems (Heavy Hands Ink, 2011), Ramos’ first poetry chapbook, was shortlisted for the 2011 Independent Literary Award in Poetry. Still, At Your Door: A Fictional Memoir (Writers AMuse Me Publishing, 2014) is Ramos' third book.
Dear Dudes: Stop Telling Me Not to Wear Lipstick
How dare you not be fuckable when you could have so easily been fuckable?
Read MoreHey Baby, How's Your Day? A Diary of Interactions With Men
BY PAIGE TOWERS
"Wow, you look delicious," he says.
It’s the first warm day of March and I’m standing on a busy corner, waiting for the light to change. I’m going home after a doctor’s appointment on the Upper East Side—walking north up 2nd Ave. The stranger who called me "delicious" is now directly beside me looking me up and down. I don’t turn to look at him but I can see him in my peripheral vision; he’s white, middle aged, wearing a suit, carrying a briefcase.
I take my phone out of my purse and text my husband.
"What is going on?" I write. "I’m being harassed constantly today. Maybe it’s the warm weather?"
The man begins to lick his lips and I’m triggered; the hair on my arms rises, my heart rate speeds up. With barely a thought, I pivot and start walking west. It’s noon and I haven’t eaten yet today; I’d planned on stopping into H&H Bagels, which would have been only one more block away on 2nd if I’d continued on my original path. But I must get away quickly.
"I want to get some of that pussy!" the man yells out at me as I walk away. I don’t look back.
Later I wondered why I didn’t turn, face this man and talk back to him. It’s unclear, but I think in that moment I was simply too tired and hungry. I was also just flat out overwhelmed. During that 35-minute walk back from the hospital to my apartment, four men commented on my appearance and/or expressed what they desired to do with me. At least five men either whistled or made some sort of tongue clicking sound in my direction. Well over a dozen men checked me out in an obvious manner—one man even leaned over and blatantly stared at my crotch for a prolonged time as I walked by.
"How you doing today?" he asked my crotch. I didn’t respond; nor did my crotch.
It didn’t matter that I looked professional, that I wore my hair in a low bun, wore a jacket zipped all the way up to my neck, black pants, flat boots, and a scarf that my husband’s mother brought home from India—I was somehow still a target.
("These pants are too tight to wear out, I guess?" I said to my husband when I got home.)
In the past I have talked back to men who harass me on the street—sometimes successfully, sometimes not. I have received quick apologies or caused men to flee the scene. I have also received extreme verbal aggression, threats of assault and have been followed. I am unsure what the best strategy is—to talk back or to ignore and avoid?—but generally I try to follow my instincts, even it leaves me feeling upset with my self-perceived weakness later.
Thus, in light of the fact that street harassment can sometimes feel like a losing battle, I’ve found another way of dealing with it. After being inspired by other women’s online accounts of men objectifying them on the street, I took to Tumblr last year by creating a blog called "Interactions With Men." It has little readership; in fact I rarely post it to my social media accounts as—I’ll admit—I’ve been discouraged by a lot of online backlash from non-feminist men (and a couple of outspoken non-feminist young women). But it’s still a way for me to record these events exactly as they happen, and there’s something empowering about that, especially considering that men on the street have sexualized me—like many other women—since age 12 and really even before, and I’m really tired of it.
What I do is carry a pocket-sized journal and pen with me at all times, and if I have a negative interaction with a man in which I feel objectified or talked down to because of my gender, I jot it down exactly as it happened. (I also occasionally just use the "Notes" function on my cellphone.) Of course, I don’t record every instance. In fact, I record very few of them, mostly—I suppose—because they happen all the time in small ways. But when an interaction immediately hits me in the gut and leaves me feeling angry or discouraged or sad, I find that writing it down exactly as it happened helps alleviate those negative feelings.
For instance, "Interaction #3" on the blog is a short entry, but it records a scenario that many women have experienced—a male stranger wanting a woman to smile for him and then turning cruel when they ignore his request. I recorded it as this:
August 2014. Vagrant man. Corner of 14th St. and 6th Ave.
Man: Smile for me, sweetheart.
Me: …
Man: C’mon baby. Just one smile. It’s a beautiful day today.
Me: …
Man: I feel sorry for you. Really, I do. I fucking do.
Me: …
Man: Stupid bitch.
It’s not lost on me that these situations are not so much interactions as they are simply, well…me being targeted and objectified by some guy. For them to become true interactions, some would say that I must do more than frown, ignore and/or walk away. Yet, my silent protest against men constantly watching and commenting on me as I move through what is perceived to be free and public space feels like the most common interaction there is: the man exerts a sense of control over the woman, the woman holds her head up and continues by, protesting through her silence. After all, do we really gain freedom and power in public space if we constantly have to be talking/fighting back? What about those times when I just want to run out and grab a quick a lunch, or want to get home after a long, stressful day?
The blog has deviated a bit in purpose as soon as I started it. My original intent was to just record the way some men talk to me on the street, but very soon I found myself wanting to write more. The way that men can sometimes talk to women—the talking down, the talking over, the "mansplaining"—these instances all left me feeling disempowered in the same way that being sexualized by a stranger on 2nd Ave. does, and sometimes even more so.
In "Interaction #5" I wrote about a security guard at a college I used to work at who loved to explain things to women, as if he was the keeper of great knowledge. When he once started to tell me about running, he neglected to listen to me repeatedly telling him that I’ve been a runner for over 15 years and have even run a marathon.
"I promise you: if I can do it, you can do it," he said at end of the interaction, still somehow refusing to hear the fact that running is a major part of my life.
In "Interaction #9" I recorded an interaction I had with a man during a business lunch in which he literally explained Amy Schumer to a female coworker and me. We both tried to jump in to the conversation as Schumer is a huge idol for both of us, but he continued to talk over us.
Here’s an excerpt:
Me: Yeah, she—
Man: It’s like, she doesn’t care what she looks like at all. She just gets up there, and doesn’t care if she’s overweight. She’s just…here’s the thing about her…(Takes sip of beer.)
Other woman: To me, Amy Schumer is a new kind of role model. She—
Man: Here’s the thing. (Sets down beer.) Amy Schumer…it’s like…She. Doesn’t. Care. And I respect that. Like, she doesn’t care what she looks like.
By the end of the interaction, it was clear that the man thought he was being feminist by pointing out that he thought it was cool that Schumer doesn’t care that she’s not pretty (in his eyes)…thus still commenting on the way she looks, instead of—I don’t know—commenting on how incredibly brilliant, funny and accomplished she is. (Or at least allowing us the chance to do so.) And yet, while I wanted to call him out on his behavior so badly at the time, the sad reality is that had I done so, I truly believe that it quickly could have turned into a conversation about the end of my position with that particular company.
I’ve made records of interactions with a male family member, a co-worker of my husband, a co-worker of my own, a deliveryman, a handyman, random men on the street, that white guy in the suit.
It’s a risky decision, I realize, as I could alienate someone close to me, or someone who has influence over my professional career. Yet, although many—no, most—of my interactions with men are neutral or positive ones, the scrutiny and misogyny I often feel during everyday activities, like boarding the subway or sitting down at a meeting, is a reminder of how far we have to go. And I’d like to make a record of where we are right now.
When I got back to my apartment after my doctor’s appointment on that warm day—still hungry, still overwhelmed—I wondered at what point I would be able to walk through public space "normally;" when would I be able to simply move forward, privileged to my own thoughts and enjoyment? I felt relief to be out of the spotlight, sure, but I was seriously defeated. So, I took out my journal, jotted down the details of a couple of those interactions that had happened on the walk home, and put them on the blog the next day.
It’s an imperfect tool, but with this blog I can, at least, provide a tiny amount of evidence to my reality. I continue on with little purpose other than wanting to provide a testimony of what being a woman can mean, although I do hope that it serves as a reminder that it’s okay not to agree with the system, with the culture, with the way things are. We can choose to talk back, or not talk back, but either way misogyny is happening—in a vast range of ways—and I have a record of events to prove it.
Paige Towers is a writer based in New York City, and her work has appeared in Bustle Magazine, The Baltimore Review, McSweeney's, Midwestern Gothic, Prime Number Magazine, Barnstorm Journal, Catch & Release: the online literary journal of Columbia University, So to Speak: a feminist journal of language and art, BioStories Magazine, and many more. You can view more here.
On Needing Diverse Books, Cinderella & Feminism
BY MACEY LAVOIE
I grew up in a world of VHS tapes and Disney Classics. My collection was an impressive mass of bulky nostalgia that I packed away as DVD’s took over. I remember my favorites: the brave Mulan and the heart-wrenching tale of Simba in the Lion King. But one thing is for sure, I have always hated Cinderella.
My family would laugh at my utter lack of interest in being a Disney princess, but from a young age something about the tale of the girl in the glass slipper irritated me. Cinderella did absolutely nothing to help herself, and it could be argued that if the fairy godmother hadn’t shown up Cinderella would still be scraping the cinders out of the fire. It was a classic damsel in distress story that even as a child I couldn’t get behind.
During that time I wanted – needed – a story that would show a healthy representation of women, especially a gay character, one who struggled and faced adversity but was able to overcome it. Such a character didn’t exist (at least to my knowledge), so I stopped reading the few LGBTQ books my friends would suggest to me.
Though my family had never spoken ill of LGBTQ individuals they didn’t outwardly advocate for them either. It was a topic that rarely found its way into conversation. I remember the truth being at the tip of my tongue, and I remembering swallowing it down as I recalled all the scenes in books where the truth caused nothing but heartache and disappointment. I would clench my hands under the table and the truth would slip back down. My mother would ask me what I was thinking and I would only shrug my shoulders: nothing much.
It wasn’t until I received a book for Christmas that my perspective of the much-loved character began to change. “Ash” by Malinda Lo is an adaptation of the Cinderella – it's got faeries and huntresses. It was this tale of magic and self-discovery that led me to consider what it would be like to put on a pair of glass slippers of my very own. Though, in this version, Ash doesn’t fall for a prince or even a man; she falls for the King’s Huntress, Kaisa.
This was my first time reading a book where the main character was bisexual and encouraged to be herself, with a complex love triangle between a mysterious faerie named Sidhean and Kaisa. I was swept up in the love story because it was something I could relate to. I identified as someone apart of the LGBTQ community and was comforted to know that – for once – the fictional characters I spend a majority of my time with reflect a part of me you don’t see represented often.
Much like Ash, I wasn’t one of those children who inherently knew about their sexuality early on. I pretty much tripped into it my early years of high school much like Ash trips into it upon discovering her romantic feelings for Kaisa. You rarely see gay characters in literature, much less a bisexual character that ends up falling for a woman.
LGBTQ books have been problematic, to say the least. The main character typically discovers their sexuality and is disowned, kicked out of their house or ostracized and bullied to the point of suicide. I remember reading this scenario over and over again until a seed of doubt was planted in my own head. Would my kind and loving family really kick me out if they knew about me? Was it that bad to be different?
Lo's version of Cinderella, however, speaks of a quiet strength, and more complexity than the original. This is a Cinderella character I could get behind. One who was kind but also brave, one who got lost in books and didn’t need to fall into the arms of a prince to be saved.
The topic of representation has been a hot spark in the publishing world for a while, as more organizations like VIDA and We Need Diverse Books gain momentum and as diverse voices are published. I can only hope that we see more writing like this come out of the woodwork.
Macey Lavoie is a new Bostonian trying to find her way around and working on her MFA at Emerson College. She has a fondness for sushi, walks on the beach, reading and mermaids. When she is not busy having crazy adventures with her friends she can be found either jotting down writing ideas in her small notebook or curled up with a book and her two cats. Her dream is to one-day change the world with a book and to own a large library.
On Solidarity: You Cannot Stand With The Group If You Do Not Stand With The Individual
BY MEGHANN PLUNKETT
This is in response to VIDA's March 6 Statement Against Silence.
The contents of the article released by VIDA illuminated dozens of accounts from women within the literary community who were abused, taken advantage of, bullied, or manipulated by an acclaimed male poet.
The article states that there may be triggers within its text, so I prepared myself before reading each account carefully. The very graphic and horrific actions described in each statement were indeed triggering, but nothing triggered me more than noticing who was reposting this article in solidarity.
About a year ago, I began to come forward with my own stories of abuse from an ex-boyfriend that I also collaborated with. I didn’t write an article, but I did confide in friends. There were several people, friends and literary community members (both men and women), who I told about the abuse and their response was to shrug it off, ignore it; I was told that it seemed "like a personal issue." No one wanted to get involved.
It was harrowing to read the experiences of these women within the VIDA article--I could have replaced my ex’s name with the name of the poet. It was uncanny.
But yesterday, I saw those same people who ignored my abuse share this article on Facebook and Twitter, they were passionate, damning our society for allowing something like this to happen.
Huh. This situation allowed them to feel comfortable standing in solidarity with a group of abused women, whereas my singular situation did not.
Without anger, I ask why?
Why do these people feel more comfortable taking a stand with a dozen anonymous women, but when faced with a one-on-one account, they shy away? Is it because as a single voice, one woman is not credible enough? Is this another instance that makes our distrust of women terribly apparent?
When I spoke about my own abuse to friends and peers, I was often met with skepticism. It was almost as if because I had allowed him in my pants, my judgment of his character was tainted. When I pointed to similar patterns of abuse he exhibited toward other women, I was treated as a "jealous ex-girlfriend." When I got angry, I was "crazy." When I recounted painful, graphic events I was backed away from. No one wanted to touch it. No one wanted to help.
I ask why because this is how we prevent one issue from becoming twenty. Abuse like this breeds. There is never just one victim.
It is easy for me to speculate that each of these women in the VIDA article were individually treated the same way I was. Discounted, questioned, diminished. Only after stripping away their names and putting them in a large group are they taken seriously.
Again, I say without anger, because at this point, I am just curious. How can I witness a sample of people support a group but not the individual. This is a pattern of action I have witnessed in many people, even myself. Why?
Yes, it might have been easier to stand in solidarity because the poet from the VIDA article, TSE, is famous and established. And it isn’t the first time we have seen a public male figure’s abuse brought to light. But why not also the low-profile figure? Why not also them?
Maybe one way of getting to the bottom of these preventative questions is by asking ourselves how we each have helped cycles of abuse by doing nothing, by doubting the victim and shying away.
When you see abuse and do nothing, you are helping. It might be illuminating to ask ourselves what would happen if we stand in solidarity with the individual while also standing in solidarity with the group.
I have read and reread the VIDA article. I can’t stop feeling empathy. I can’t stop reliving my own trauma. I can’t stop asking these questions. And at my stage in recovery, it is important for me to begin to piece apart the way we as a society handle issues like these. I need to understand the mindset, our holdups, our hesitations, our fears.
For me, this is an invitation to analyze our reactions to female trauma, from single aggression to systemic oppression.
I want to thank the women who spoke out with all my trembling heart. I want to thank VIDA for giving them a platform. I want to walk taller today, because this is progress. We are about to do better, do more. I can feel it.
Meghann Plunkett is a poet, performer, coder and feminist. Her work has appeared in national and international literary journals including Muzzle Magazine, The Paris-American, Simon&Schuster's anthology Chorus, and Southword. She teaches creative workshops at Omega Institute and co-directs a children's summer camp called Writers' Week Aboard the Black Dog Tall Ships in Martha's Vineyard. Currently, Meghann is an MFA candidate at Southern Illinois University.
The Crazy Shit I Did To Catcallers
BY ELIZABETH TSUNG
People have been hitting on me ever since I was a sophomore in high school, and I’ve always felt repulsed by it. Growing up and living in NYC, I experience street harassment more than ever; perhaps it’s from how populated this city is, or maybe, there are more confident people here. I lost count at an early age on how many times I’ve been catcalled, and I’m sure others can relate. It’s become a hazy memory in my head, but I can still remember how I felt — weak, defeated, pathetic. I miss living in the Midwest when raccoons and wild animals were all I had to be afraid of and people seemed more respectable there.
Some people I know think I’m overly sensitive for not enjoying being catcalled, but I don’t know how any woman can see it as a compliment. Not only do I see it as a threat, I am absolutely terrified of responding to a person only to have him or her retaliate against me.
About a year ago, a man whistled at me and told me I had sexy legs. I told him to STFU, only to have him follow me for a few blocks before he got bored and went away. My palms started to sweat and I almost called 911. I consider myself lucky to have gotten away — lord knows what could’ve happened had it been someone else, someone more violent. Maybe it’s because I am a victim of sexual assault that I am overly sensitive to this topic, but I don’t think it warrants me having an excuse. Every person should be concerned about street harassment, as meaningless as the situation may seem to them. Street harassment victims should also never be told it was their fault, or they could’ve worn different clothing. Just like rape victims, street harassment victims should not be blamed for what happened.
According to Stop Street Harassment, an organization dedicated to ending street harassment around the world, in a study of 2,000 participants, two out of three women and one out of four men have experienced street harassment in their lifetimes. A person’s income did not factor in the amount of times he or she has been catcalled; however, people of color (including myself) and LGBT+ are at greater risk. Women are also catcalled at least three times more than men before they turn seventeen. This epidemic is a topic that is incredibly under-researched, but don’t these findings call for greater action?
Being an overly inquisitive teenager, that trait never left me as I grew older. A few years ago I experimented when I saw someone walking towards me and looking at me in a way that made me uncomfortable. At first, I walked with a child’s pocket knife in my pocket. I never felt any safer carrying a weapon; in fact, I hated that I even resorted to violence. So I picked my nose. I dug my fingers so far up there that when I got home that night, it bled and it hurt to breathe. When the man got closer to me, he looked away immediately and I saw his eyebrows crinkle in disgust. I will never forget that image because I felt so safe then, knowing that my unladylike attitude drove him away. I started doing this more and more, picking at invisible food in my teeth and walking with a limp (which I later learned was problematic), and doing all sorts of things to turn men off. Eventually, I started assuming the role of a nasty, unkempt woman, even at times when I didn’t feel threatened.
I recently realized how unfortunate my situation was. In a world where businesses and media thrive on telling women they’re not beautiful, acting out in vulgar ways completely depressed and drained me. I kept telling myself it was for survival, I was acting out of survival; and it was, but I hated that I had to do that and wanted things to change.
Street harassment doesn’t always stop there. It is a serious threat to our rights as humans to not feel safe in a space or have access to resources when we encounter this. Street harassment may seem unassuming, but It can escalate towards rape and murder if a perpetrator feels threatened or humiliated by their victim. Sometimes their victims haven’t even done anything to trigger them, yet they still act out in unsettling ways.
I don’t remember when I became so brave, but being able to talk about this with other victims gave me the confidence to walk around without feeling intimidated anymore. Now I always hold my phone in my hands when I walk. When men and women call at me these days, I have no issue snapping a picture of them, telling them I’ll report them to the police. Often enough, they back off and say it was just a joke. Maybe it was, to them, but I’m not taking that chance.
Elizabeth Tsung is a Taiwanese American second generation New Yorker. She collects tabby cats and fairy dust.